Now accepting design partners

Cursor for your
business data.

Connect your business systems. Surface every place they disagree. Let a human pick the right answer once — and give every AI agent, chatbot, and report a clean, compact context they can actually trust.

HubSpot
+
BigQuery
+
Stripe
+
Segment
+
Notion
One trusted answer
scroll

Like Cursor understood your codebase.
Linqura understands your business data.

Cursor became essential because it understood your entire codebase — not just individual files, but the relationships between them. Your AI agents need the same thing for your business data: not just access to a warehouse, but an understanding of which number is canonical, which source has been approved, and which definitions conflict across the systems you actually use.

Snowflake and Databricks govern data inside their own platform. But most companies' truth lives across HubSpot, Stripe, BigQuery, Segment, Notion, and Intercom — all telling slightly different stories. Linqura resolves conflicts between those systems, not just within one.
Without Linqura

Your AI picks a number and hopes it's right.

Warehouse governance tools work well — inside their platform. But when churn lives in HubSpot, active customers are counted differently in Stripe and Segment, and no layer knows which one to trust, your AI picks whichever number it finds first and calls it "high confidence."

With Linqura

Your AI calls one API and gets the approved answer.

Before your agent ever runs, a human on your team looked at the conflicting sources, picked the right one, and approved it. Now every agent, every report, and every chatbot gets that same answer automatically — with the source, the owner, and a freshness check attached. Across every system you use.

The Problem

Unresolved data is fine
until someone has to act on it.

Most companies have business data spread across 3–5 systems that tell slightly different stories. That's manageable — until someone needs to act on it. A business user asks a question, or an AI agent runs a workflow. When there's no agreed source of truth, there's no reliable answer — for a human or an agent. That's not acceptable when decisions depend on it.

HubSpot · RevOps
4.2%
Rolling 30-day cancelled MRR ÷ starting MRR. Excludes expansion.
Stripe · Billing
5.1%
Subscription cancellations ÷ active subscriptions at period start.
BigQuery · Warehouse
4.8%
Events-based. Includes downgrades as partial churn.
The only way to help your AI pick the right answer — without Linqura — is to fan out across 3–5 MCP tool calls, pull raw data from every system into context, and hope the model reasons correctly. That's ~50,000 tokens per query, multiple round trips, and it's still unreliable. Or you hard-code one source and pray it stays accurate.

How It Works

Three steps.
One source of truth.

Linqura sits between your data sources and anything that needs to use them — your AI agents, your chatbots, your reports, your team.

1

Connect your systems

Plug in your warehouse, CRM, billing tool, support system, and docs. Linqura maps every metric and entity across all of them — finding every place two systems tell a different story.

Snowflake BigQuery HubSpot Stripe Segment Notion Intercom
2

A human picks the right answer — once

Everywhere two systems disagree, Linqura surfaces the conflict and asks someone on your team to pick the right answer. That decision is saved into your Trust Registry — the single place where your company's agreed-upon definitions live. Every future question, from a human or an agent, uses that approved answer automatically.

3

Build your AI on top

Your agents make one call to Linqura instead of fanning out across 3–5 MCP tools. They get back a compact context package — the right number, the source, who owns it, when it was last checked. Every correction feeds back into the graph, so future queries get faster and cheaper automatically.

Three people. One system.

Linqura is the layer that makes your business data ready for AI — so every answer, from a human or an agent, comes from a source your team has verified.

1

Connect systems

Plug in your warehouse, HubSpot, Stripe, Notion. Takes an hour.

2

Work the queue

Linqura surfaces every conflict. You pick the right answer — once.

3

Trust Registry ready

Approved sources, metric definitions, entity mappings — all locked in.

Done once

Maintained automatically as data changes. New conflicts surface in the queue.

1

Ask in plain English

What was enterprise churn last quarter? No SQL. No dashboard hunting.

2

Get provenance

The answer shows the number, the source, who approved it, and when it was last checked.

Flag if wrong

One click to correct. Updates the graph so the same mistake never happens again.

1

One API call

linqura.get_context("churn_rate") → compact context package (~200 tokens)

2

Build on top

Approved answer, source, owner, freshness. No MCP fan-out needed.

Gets cheaper over time

User corrections flow back into the graph. Future queries route faster and cost less.

The Differentiator

ML finds the conflicts.
Humans resolve them.
The system gets smarter.

Linqura isn't asking you to trust a confidence score. It uses machine learning to scan your systems, detect where definitions drift, and surface the conflicts worth resolving. But the actual decision — which source is right, which definition your company uses — is made by a person. That human judgment is what makes an answer trustworthy in a way no model confidence can replicate.

And every decision your team makes teaches Linqura more about how your business thinks about its data. The graph improves. Future conflicts surface with more context. New data sources get resolved faster. The product gets better the more your team uses it — because the judgment that improves it is yours.

1

ML scans and surfaces

Linqura automatically finds every place two systems define the same concept differently — metrics, entities, definitions that drift over time or across tools.

2

A human makes the call

Your team looks at the options and picks the right answer. Not a model score — a real business decision, made by the person who knows what your company actually means by "active customer."

3

The graph improves — and gets leaner

Every approved decision is stored. Future conflicts surface faster. Future agent queries route directly to the resolved answer — one call, no MCP fan-out, less context consumed. The more your team engages, the smarter and cheaper every agent query becomes.

Already have a dbt gold layer or a clean data pipeline?

Good — Linqura works best on top of one. Your pipeline defines how metrics are calculated. Linqura adds what a pipeline can't: a named human who approved that definition, a correction workflow when the answer is wrong, a compact agent-ready context API that wraps the output, and resolution for the data that never made it into the warehouse — HubSpot properties, Notion docs, the spreadsheet RevOps still uses for the board deck.

If you don't have a mature pipeline yet, Linqura helps you define what it should say before you build it.

See how a disagreement gets resolved.

When Linqura finds two systems giving different answers to the same question, it puts that conflict in front of a human. You look at the options, pick the right one, and approve it. That decision sticks — permanently. Every agent, chatbot, and report from that point on uses the answer you approved. Try it below.
Linqura · Conflict Review 2 disagreements to resolve
churn_rate 3 systems disagree
HubSpot, Stripe, and BigQuery all calculate churn differently. Select which one your company should use — or describe what it means for your business and Linqura will map it.
HubSpot · RevOps
4.2%
Rolling 30-day cancelled MRR ÷ starting MRR. Excludes expansion.
Data path
hs_deals mrr_movements churn_rate_30d
Updated 2h ago
BigQuery · Warehouse
4.8%
Events-based. Includes downgrades as partial churn.
Data path
subscription_events billing_facts churn_calc
Updated 6h ago
Stripe · Billing
5.1%
Subscription cancellations ÷ active subscriptions at period start.
Data path
stripe_subscriptions stripe_events churn_stripe
Updated 1h ago · via webhook
Select a source above, or describe your own definition
Approved — every agent and report now uses this answer
Source approved Owner recorded Data path confirmed No further conflicts Saved to Trust Registry
active_customers 3 systems disagree
Product, Growth, and Finance each count active customers differently — with a 231-person gap between the highest and lowest number.
↑ Resolve churn_rate above to unlock this one
Segment · Product
1,842
Users with at least 1 event in the last 30 days.
Data path
segment_events user_activity active_30d
Updated 1h ago
HubSpot · Growth
1,611
Contacts with active status and non-zero MRR in CRM.
Data path
hs_contacts hs_deals active_mrr
Updated 4h ago
BigQuery · Finance
1,724
Rows where subscription_status = 'active' in the billing table.
Data path
stripe_subscriptions billing_facts active_subs
Updated 3h ago
Select a source above, or describe your own definition
Approved — every agent and report now uses this answer
Source approved Owner recorded Data path confirmed No further conflicts Saved to Trust Registry

One API call.
~200 tokens.
Trusted answer.

After the conflicts are resolved, your AI agents don't need to figure anything out. They call Linqura's context API and get back exactly what they need — the approved number, which system it came from, who signed off on it, and when it was last checked. No MCP fan-out across five systems. No dumping your entire warehouse into context. And if a question touches multiple sources — a report referencing a doc referencing a metric — Linqura figures out which ones to call and in what order. You don't wire that logic into every agent separately. One call. Done.

Python · Agent context call
# Before your agent acts on business data
context = linqura.get_context("churn_rate")

# Returns a compact context package:
# {
# value: 0.042,
# source: "HubSpot · RevOps",
# definition: "Rolling 30-day cancelled MRR
# ÷ starting MRR",
# approved_by: "Sarah Chen",
# last_checked: "2h ago",
# conflicts: false
# }

# Your agent now acts on the answer your
# team already agreed on — not a guess.
Without Linqura
~50k
tokens · 3–5 MCP calls per question to pull competing sources and let the model reason over them
With Linqura
~200
tokens · 1 API call — one compact context package, gets cheaper as the graph learns

Build AI agents in days, not months

The resolution layer is already built. Your agents skip straight to using trusted data — you don't spend months building the infrastructure that makes it trustworthy.

Add a new data source in hours

Connect a new system, and Linqura automatically finds every place it conflicts with what you already have. Resolve the conflicts, and the new source is trusted everywhere instantly.

Every answer is correctable — and feeds the graph

If an agent or a human gets a wrong answer, they flag it. That correction updates the approved source — so the same mistake never happens twice, and future queries route directly without any re-resolution work.

Gets cheaper to run as it learns

The first time your agent asks about a metric, Linqura may route through resolution. The hundredth time, it returns the answer in a single graph lookup — no extra MCP calls, no extra tokens. Resolution happens once. Savings compound indefinitely.

One call. Not five.

The same query. Two approaches. Watch what each one does under the hood.

"What's our churn rate this month?"
Without Linqura
← click Run query
3 conflicting results — model picks one
HubSpot: 4.2%  ·  BigQuery: 4.8%  ·  Stripe: 5.1%
→ Chose 4.8% (no reason given)
Calls: 4  ·  Tokens: ~50,000  ·  Approved: No
With Linqura
← click Run query
One approved answer
4.2%  ·  HubSpot mrr_movements
Owner: Sarah Chen  ·  Updated 2h ago  ·  ✓ Trust Registry
Calls: 1  ·  Tokens: ~200  ·  Approved: Yes ✓

For Your Team

The same layer that powers your AI
gives your team answers they trust.

Business users ask questions in plain English and get answers that show exactly where the number came from, who approved it, and when it was last updated. The right answer is already verified before anyone asks.

Any generic AI data tool
NL → SQL → Answer
"Your churn rate is 4.8% based on the most recent data available."
Source: events_table (BigQuery)
Confidence: high
Linqura
Resolve first → then answer
"Your churn rate is 4.2% — rolling 30-day cancelled MRR ÷ starting MRR, excluding expansion."
HubSpot · RevOps (mrr_movements)
Approved by: Sarah Chen · Updated 2h ago
Source approved by your team No other sources conflict

Build vs. Buy

Building this yourself takes
6–9 months. Linqura takes 90 days.

Multi-source resolution with human approval workflows, data path tracking, provenance tagging, and a context API is not a weekend project. Every team that has tried to build this has shipped something brittle or run out of runway.

Building it yourself
$400k+
in engineering time, minimum — before you ship anything to users
Detecting conflicts across systems with different schemas and update schedules
Tracking where every number came from across multi-hop data pipelines
Building a human approval flow with version history and owner assignment
Packaging approved context into compact API objects your agents can call
Monitoring freshness and re-surfacing conflicts when sources drift
Using Linqura (90-day pilot)
$6k
total — $2k/month for 3 months, success criteria agreed upfront
3–5 systems connected in week one
10–20 business metrics defined and approved by month one
Natural-language answers for your top recurring questions
Context API live — your first agent workflow powered by Linqura
Your team owns the trust registry going forward

Who It's For

Building AI on business data
that hasn't been verified?
That's where we start.

You have a data warehouse — Snowflake, BigQuery, or Postgres — with real business data in it
Your data lives across 3+ systems that don't always agree (CRM, billing, product, support)
Your data team spends most of their time answering the same questions over and over
Someone at your company owns data decisions — there's a person who can say "that's the number we use"
You're building or evaluating AI agents or internal chatbots that need to use business data

If you check 4 of 5, we should talk.

Head of Data
"I'm tired of being the human API between the business and the warehouse."
Linqura handles the recurring questions automatically, with sources attached. Your team focuses on the work that actually needs them.
CTO / AI Lead
"We want to build AI agents for internal workflows — but we don't trust the data they'd be acting on, and the token costs are killing us."
Linqura is the infrastructure layer your agents call before acting. One API call instead of five MCP round trips. You build the agent. We make sure it's fast, cheap, and working from the right data.
RevOps / COO
"Our board deck took three days to reconcile last quarter because RevOps and Finance had different churn numbers."
One conflict resolved in Linqura means every future question about that metric gets the same answer — for everyone.

What 90 days looks like.

Fixed scope. Success criteria agreed upfront. Click each phase to see what gets built.

At $2,000/month, you're spending less than the cost of one engineer-week per month — and in 90 days you have a working trust registry, approved metrics, natural-language reporting, and a live context API your agents can call.
1
Weeks 1–2
Connect & Map
Hook up your systems, find every disagreement
2
Weeks 3–4
Resolve
Work through conflicts, define your 10–20 core metrics
3
Month 2
Answer
Your team asks questions, gets answers with sources attached
4
Month 3
Ship
Context API live, first agent workflow running on Linqura
    $2,000/month · 3 months · success criteria agreed upfront. Design partner pricing — we build together.

    Your agents are ready.
    Is your data?

    We're accepting a small number of pilot partners. Tell us about your setup and we'll follow up within 48 hours.

    Tell us about your setup

    Share where you are. We'll read it and follow up within 48 hours if it sounds like a fit.

    Got it. We'll review your setup and follow up within 48 hours.
    — The Linqura team